Lego’s corporate model is key to its brick-by-brick success - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

Lego’s corporate model is key to its brick-by-brick success

The Danish company has benefitted from being built on a long-term perspective

Many one-product companies run out of road. Small plastic bricks have supported Denmark’s Lego for more than 70 years. A clear focus can pay off. But, amid a debate over the health of public markets, its success also demonstrates the benefits of its distinctive corporate structure.

The toymaker’s sales growth of 2 per cent last year was dragged down by a weak performance in China. But it was respectable enough given a seven per cent decline in toy industry sales. Lego’s sales are not much less than the combined total of its quoted US rivals Mattel and Hasbro. 

Inflation, one cause of the industry’s woes, is subsiding. Low birth rates, another problem, will persist. That is partly offset by adult fans of Lego. This group — known as Afols — creates a market for costly, complicated kits like the Titanic or Eiffel Tower. This “Icons” line made some of the biggest gains of any toy property globally in 2023, according to Circana. 

New products accounted for roughly half of Lego’s portfolio last year. Innovation isn’t without risk: novelty can damage profitability if it means fewer universal pieces that can be produced in high volumes for lots of different kits. The proliferation of parts contributed to Lego’s downturn in 2003, says academic David Robertson. However, the business has since expanded so it can use more parts without hurting the ratio of sales to profits.   

Lego’s operating profit margin fell by 1.7 per cent to 26 per cent, as it spent more on stores, its supply chain and digital operations. Even so, that is nearly three times Hasbro’s adjusted operating figure. Were it quoted, Lego would be worth much more than the $43bn estimate arrived at by using Hasbro’s trailing EV-to-ebitda ratio of 15.5 times.

But Lego is privately held and there is no sign of that changing. Kirkbi, an investment vehicle run by the founding family, owns 75 per cent, with the remainder owned by the Lego Foundation. When an heir opted to sell some Kirkbi shares for $930mn last year, family members took up the slack. Outside investors’ only exposure to the brand is through Legoland-owner Merlin Entertainments. Blackstone and Canadian pension fund CPPIB teamed up with Kirkbi on the £6bn take-private bid in 2019. 

External investors might have been less inclined to tolerate last year’s 10 per cent dividend cut to fund investment. There is evidence that tightly held companies like Lego benefit from a long-term perspective. Building the business, like its product, is an exercise in patience. It can yield impressive results.

[email protected]

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

FT社评:特朗普加倍坚持其对加沙的鲁莽计划

这一提议突显了这位世界上最有权势的领导人推行外交政策时的不负责任。

弗里德里希•默茨还能拯救德国吗?

这位总理竞选的领跑者有大胆的经济改革计划,但与极右翼的暧昧关系损害了他的竞选。

Lex专栏:瑞银是欧洲银行业最孤独的登山者

与其将目光投向欧洲其他国家,瑞银更希望缩小与摩根士丹利等美国竞争对手的差距。

美国大宗商品贸易商ADM全球裁员700人

面对全球贸易战的威胁,美国大宗商品贸易商阿彻丹尼尔斯米德兰大力削减成本。

中国对美国征收关税回击特朗普

在美国对中国进口商品加征额外10%关税后,北京将目标对准能源和谷歌。

Palantir预测马斯克的政府削减成本将为其带来意外之财

首席执行官表示,马斯克的政府效率部门将对数据分析集团“非常利好”。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×