Golden shares: a tarnished solution that smacks of protectionism - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

Golden shares: a tarnished solution that smacks of protectionism

State shares take a toll in terms of performance and free markets

State-held shares are back on the agenda. Popular during Europe’s wave of privatisation in the 1970s and 80s, so called golden shares — spezialaktie in Germany — allowed governments to wield control over a slew of public companies including utilities and oil and gas majors. By far the bulk had been redeemed by the turn of the millennium.

With globalisation in retreat and protectionism firmly re-ensconced, British politicians are hoping to spark a revival. The defence committee wants them reinstated across defence companies, irked at US private equity owned Cobham’s $3.6bn bid for Ultra Electronics. More speciously, MP Tom Tugendhat is angling for a government share — and a 25.1 per cent stake — in Arm, the chip designer, which owner SoftBank plans to list in New York after its planned $40bn sale to Nvidia collapsed. Echoing Washington and Beijing, he argues that national security is part and parcel of technological leadership.

State shares, like those held by tech founders, take a toll in terms of performance and free markets. An asymmetric veto on takeovers deprives other shareholders of the opportunity to sell; a particular handicap in the UK’s M&A-heavy market. Take the redemption of golden shares in water and electricity utilities in the mid-1990s. To the dismay of politicians, this unleashed a flurry of bids and within two years all but one of the 12 regional electricity companies had been flogged.

The European Commission, more concerned at the impediment to the free flow of capital, was largely successful in stamping them out although holdouts — especially in the UK — remain. These include BAE and Rolls-Royce, both of which operate defence capabilities.

There is a case to be made for government vetoes when it comes to national security. Golden shares also have a use elsewhere, such as fostering environmental or social missions. The Thomson family’s founders’ share in Thomson Reuters, designed to safeguard independence and lack of bias in reporting, also makes sense. Slapping similar government rights on to tech companies does not.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

战略利益刺激海湾地区可再生能源支出

阿联酋和沙特阿拉伯引领该地区努力减少对石油和天然气的依赖。

2024年清洁技术投资有望达到2万亿美元

但这一支出仍不到2030年代初实现净零排放目标所需估计水平的一半。

非洲是否应该用化石燃料支持绿色转型?

支持继续使用化石燃料的人说,这是非洲大陆实现工业化的唯一途径。

Lex专栏:空客展示了双头垄断力量的局限性

这家欧洲集团并不能从竞争对手波音的困境中获利。

埃克森美孚巨型项目或将造就世界最后的石油国

批评人士担心,石油资源将使圭亚那成为“资源诅咒”的受害者。

欧洲极右翼崛起后,投资者面临的真正风险是什么?

梅勒:如果断定法国正处于经济灾难的边缘,那就太极端了。但在法国国家和欧盟层面都存在风险,可能会对企业和市场造成长期影响。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×